From: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, PostgreSQL <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands: \quit_if, \quit_unless) |
Date: | 2017-02-14 09:33:22 |
Message-ID: | CADkLM=cQPaYkDgnN=ic5_SAes5oWO5JtZnrYt2Gqd7PjYV1v9A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> @in't gonna execute it?
>>
>
> Hmmm... This is too much of an Americanism, IMHO.
The @ looks like a handwritten 'a'. @in't gonna => ain't gonna => will
not. It's a bad joke, made as a way of saying that I also could not think
of a good mnemonic for '@' or ','.
> I'm here all week, try the veal.
>>
>
> Sorry, syntax error, you have lost me. Some googling suggests a reference
> to post WW2 "lounge entertainers", probably in the USA. I also do not
> understand why this would mean "yes".
It's a thing lounge entertainers said after they told a bad joke.
> . for z (waiting for the end of the sentence, i.e. endif)
>
+1 ... if we end up displaying the not-true-and-not-evaluated 'z' state.
> & for t (no real mnemonic)
>
> For two states:
> * for being executed (beware, it is ***important***)
>
It does lend importance, but that's also the line continuation marker for
"comment". Would that be a problem?
> / for not (under the hood, and it is opposed to *)
>
+1, I was going to suggest '/' for a false state, with two possible
metaphors to justify it
1. the slash in a "no" sign ("no smoking", ghostbusters, etc)
2. the leading char of a c/java/javascript comment (what is written here
is just words, not code)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-02-14 09:48:39 | Re: Proposal: GetOldestXminExtend for ignoring arbitrary vacuum flags |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-02-14 09:24:46 | Re: parallelize queries containing subplans |