| From: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks |
| Date: | 2021-01-19 17:55:10 |
| Message-ID: | CADkLM=cFjr1CWp_6u-4wwMd_XN1AEtEASijZRfKxVFj3F4AGQg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> I decided not to deviate from pk_ terminology so that the new code
> doesn't look too different from the other code in the file. Although,
> I guess we can at least call the main function
> ri_ReferencedKeyExists() instead of ri_PrimaryKeyExists(), so I've
> changed that.
>
I agree with leaving the existing terminology where it is for this patch.
Changing the function name is probably enough to alert the reader that the
things that are called pks may not be precisely that.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | James Hilliard | 2021-01-19 17:55:46 | Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Fix detection of pwritev support for OSX. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-01-19 17:50:55 | Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes |