| From: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, PostgreSQL <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands: \quit_if, \quit_unless) |
| Date: | 2017-02-11 20:07:04 |
| Message-ID: | CADkLM=c2fodPhx6_YpMn-B9e8EU8858dWvxq3jUHWC0Ysjv4Ug@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
>
> Ok, so that's not just PROMPT_READY, that's every prompt...which might be
>> ok. ? is a great optional cue, and you're thinking on 2 levels deep, 2nd
>> level always being '.'?
>>
>
> Yep. The idea is to keep it short, but to still have something to say
> "there are more levels" in the stack, hence the one dot. Basically I just
> compressed your 4 level proposal, and added a separator to deal with the
> preceding stuff and suggest the conditional.
>
> --
> Fabien.
>
Just realized that '?' means "unknown transactional status" in %x. That
might cause confusion if a person had a prompt of %x%R. Is that enough
reason to pick a different cue?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2017-02-11 20:48:17 | Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands: \quit_if, \quit_unless) |
| Previous Message | Ryan Murphy | 2017-02-11 18:54:28 | Re: Access inside pg_node_tree from query? |