From: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
Date: | 2025-03-25 14:53:22 |
Message-ID: | CADkLM=c0dOJZUQuWzVcE2BsJSVRGcX7HkJH8wYjo+OD83WFqcg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> * Changed to use LookupExplicitNamespace()
>
Seems good.
> * Added test for temp tables
>
+1
> * Doc fixes
So this patch swings the pendulum a bit back towards accepting some things
as errors. That's understandable, as we're never going to have a situation
where we can guarantee that the restore functions never generate an error,
so the best we can do is to draw the error-versus-warning line at a place
that:
* doesn't mess up flawed restores that we would otherwise expect to
complete at least partially
* is easy for us to understand
* is easy for us to explain
* we can live with for the next couple of decades
I don't know where that line should be drawn, so if people are happy with
Jeff's demarcation, then less roll with it.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-03-25 14:57:46 | Re: vacuum_truncate configuration parameter and isset_offset |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2025-03-25 14:32:46 | Re: why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY? |