From: | Remi Colinet <remi(dot)colinet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | [PATCH] New command to monitor progression of long running queries |
Date: | 2017-04-17 12:09:01 |
Message-ID: | CADdR5nyi8fUXv7mOn-TmuY4JF7yQRhmCE_dZxqzd8YGdwc28yg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
I've implemented a new command named PROGRESS to monitor progression of
long running SQL queries in a backend process.
Use case
=======
A use case is shown in the below example based on a table named t_10m with
10 millions rows.
The table has been created with :
CREATE TABLE T_10M ( id integer, md5 text);
INSERT INTO T_10M SELECT generate_series(1,10000000) AS id,
md5(random()::text) AS md5;
1/ Start a first psql session to run long SQL queries:
[pgadm(at)rco ~]$ psql -A -d test
psql (10devel)
Type "help" for help.
test=#
The option -A is used to allow rows to be output without formatting work.
Redirect output to a file in order to let the query run without terminal
interaction:
test=# \o out
Start a long running query:
test=# select * from t_10M order by md5;
2/ In a second psql session, list the backend pid and their SQL query
[pgadm(at)rco ~]$ psql -d test
psql (10devel)
Type "help" for help.
test=# select pid, query from pg_stat_activity ;
pid | query
-------+-------------------------------------------
19081 |
19084 |
19339 | select pid, query from pg_stat_activity ;
19341 | select * from t_10m order by md5;
19727 | select * from t_10m order by md5;
19726 | select * from t_10m order by md5;
19079 |
19078 |
19080 |
(9 rows)
test=#
Chose the pid of the backend running the long SQL query to be monitored.
Above example is a parallel SQL query. Lowest pid is the main backend of
the query.
test=# PROGRESS 19341;
PLAN PROGRESS
------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------
Gather Merge
-> Sort=> dumping tuples to tapes
rows r/w merge 0/0 rows r/w effective 0/2722972 0%
Sort Key: md5
-> Parallel Seq Scan on t_10m => rows 2751606/3954135 69% blks
125938/161222 78%
(5 rows)
test=#
The query of the monitored backend is:
test=# select * from t_10M order by md5;
Because the table has 10 millions of rows, the sort is done on tapes.
Design of the command
=================
The design of the patch/command is:
- the user issue the "PROGRESS pid" command from a psql session. The pid is
the one of the backend which runs the SQL query for which we want to get a
progression report. It can be determined from the view pg_stat_activity.
- the monitoring backend, upon receiving the "PROGRESS pid" command from
psql utility used in step above, sends a signal to the backend whose
process pid is the one provided in the PROGRESS command.
- the monitored backend receives the signal and notes the request as for
any interrupt. Then, it continues its execution of its SQL query until
interrupts can be serviced.
- when the monitored process can service the interrupts, it deals with the
progress request by collecting its execution tree with the execution
progress of each long running node. At this time, the SQL query is no more
running. The progression of each node is calculated during the execution of
the SQL query which is at this moment stopped. The execution tree is dumped
in shared memory pages allocated at the start of the server. Then, the
monitored backend set a latch on which the monitoring process is waiting
for. It then continues executing its SQL query.
- the monitoring backend collects the share memory data dumped by the
monitored backed, and sends it to its psql session, as a list of rows.
The command PROGRESS does not incur any slowness on the running query
because the execution progress is only computed upon receiving the progress
request which is supposed to be seldom used.
The code heavily reuses the one of the explain command. In order to share
as much code as possible with the EXPLAIN command, part of the EXPLAIN code
which deals with reporting quals for instance, has been moved to a new
report.c file in the src/backend/commands folder. This code in report.c is
shared between explain.c source code and PROGRESS command source code which
is in progress.c file.
The progression reported by PROGRESS command is given in terms of rows,
blocks, bytes and percents. The values displayed depend on the node type in
the execution plan.
The current patch implements all the possible nodes which could take a lot
of time:
- Sequential scan nodes with rows and block progress (node type T_SeqScan,
T_SampleScan, T_BitmapHeaepScan, T_SubqueryScan, T_FunctionScan,
T_ValuesScan, T_CteScan, T_WorkTableScan)
- Tuple id scan node with rows and blocks progress (T_TidScan)
- Limit node with rows progress (T_Limit)
- Foreign and custom scan with rows and blocks progress (T_ForeignScan,
T_CustomScan)
- Index scan, index only scan and bitmap index scan with rows and blocks
progress
Patch
====
The diff stat of the patch is:
[root(at)rco pg]# git diff --stat master..
contrib/auto_explain/auto_explain.c | 5 +-
contrib/postgres_fdw/postgres_fdw.c | 13 +-
src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c | 2 +
src/backend/commands/Makefile | 3 +-
src/backend/commands/explain.c | 2834
++++++++++++++----------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
src/backend/commands/prepare.c | 5 +-
src/backend/commands/progress.c | 1314
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
src/backend/commands/report.c | 2120
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++
src/backend/executor/execProcnode.c | 31 ++
src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c | 13 +-
src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c | 13 +-
src/backend/executor/nodeIndexscan.c | 15 +-
src/backend/executor/nodeSamplescan.c | 12 +-
src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c | 16 +-
src/backend/nodes/bitmapset.c | 19 +
src/backend/nodes/outfuncs.c | 245 ++++++++++
src/backend/parser/gram.y | 99 +++-
src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c | 1 +
src/backend/storage/file/buffile.c | 47 ++
src/backend/storage/ipc/ipci.c | 3 +
src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c | 57 +++
src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 4 +
src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.c | 7 +-
src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlocknames.txt | 1 +
src/backend/tcop/postgres.c | 10 +
src/backend/tcop/pquery.c | 25 +
src/backend/tcop/utility.c | 10 +
src/backend/utils/init/globals.c | 12 +
src/backend/utils/sort/tuplesort.c | 142 +++++-
src/backend/utils/sort/tuplestore.c | 73 ++-
src/include/commands/explain.h | 67 +--
src/include/commands/prepare.h | 2 +-
src/include/commands/report.h | 136 ++++++
src/include/executor/execdesc.h | 2 +
src/include/executor/progress.h | 52 ++
src/include/foreign/fdwapi.h | 10 +-
src/include/nodes/bitmapset.h | 1 +
src/include/nodes/execnodes.h | 3 +
src/include/nodes/extensible.h | 6 +-
src/include/nodes/nodes.h | 8 +
src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h | 11 +
src/include/nodes/plannodes.h | 11 +
src/include/parser/kwlist.h | 4 +
src/include/pgstat.h | 3 +-
src/include/storage/buffile.h | 8 +
src/include/storage/procarray.h | 3 +
src/include/storage/procsignal.h | 3 +
src/include/utils/tuplesort.h | 71 ++-
src/include/utils/tuplestore.h | 33 ++
49 files changed, 4979 insertions(+), 2606 deletions(-)
[root(at)rco pg]#
The progress command can be used with the watch command of psql making it
more handy to monitor a long running query.
The default format of the PROGRESS command is text. It can be easily
expanded to json and xml as for EXPLAIN command.
The patch is based on commit 85a0781334a204c15c9c6ea9d3e6c75334c2beb6
(Date: Fri Apr 14 17:51:25 2017 -0400)
Use cases
========
Some further examples of use are shown below in the test_v1.txt file.
What do you make of this idea/patch?
Does it make sense?
Any suggestion is welcome.
The current patch is still work in progress. It is meanwhile stable. It can
be used with regular queries. Utilities commands are not supported for the
moment.
Documentation is not yet written.
Regards
Remi
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
test_v1.txt | text/plain | 9.2 KB |
progress_v1.patch | text/x-patch | 272.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2017-04-17 12:13:12 | Re: some review comments on logical rep code |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2017-04-17 11:00:07 | Re: pgbench - allow to store select results into variables |