From: | Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm. |
Date: | 2017-02-22 18:19:48 |
Message-ID: | CAD__OugAA-DrUsA71EUs_fnOB_DoJ91upP+R0FfGD-7oh=-x+g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi all thanks,
I have tried to fix all of the comments given above with some more
code cleanups.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 6:28 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think it's OK to treat that as something of a corner case. There's
> nothing to keep you from doing that today: just use pg_buffercache to
> dump a list of blocks on one server, and then pass those blocks to
> pg_prewarm on another server. The point of this patch, AIUI, is to
> automate a particularly common case of that, which is to dump before
> shutdown and load upon startup. It doesn't preclude other things that
> people want to do.
>
> I suppose we could have an SQL-callable function that does an
> immediate dump (without starting a worker). That wouldn't hurt
> anything, and might be useful in a case like the one you mention.
In the latest patch, I have moved the things back as in old ways there
will be one bgworker "auto pg_prewarm" which automatically records
information about blocks which were present in buffer pool before
server shutdown and then prewarm the buffer pool upon server restart
with those blocks. I have reverted back the code which helped us to
launch the stopped "auto pg_prewarm" bgworker. The reason I introduced
a launcher SQL utility function is the running auto pg_prewarm can be
stopped by the user by setting dump_interval to -1. So if the user
wants to restart the stopped auto pg_prewarm(this time dump only to
prewarm on next restart), he can use that utility. The user can launch
the auto pg_prewarm to dump periodically while the server is still
running. If that was not the concern I think I misunderstood the
comments and overdid the design. So as a first patch I will keep the
things simple. Also,
using a separate process for prewarm and dump activity was a bad
design hence reverted back same. The auto pg_prewarm can only be
launched by preloading the library. And I can add additional
utilities, once we can formalize what is really needed out of it.
--
Thanks and Regards
Mithun C Y
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pg_auto_prewarm_05.patch | application/octet-stream | 25.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-02-22 18:19:54 | Note about bug #14563 |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-02-22 17:55:51 | Re: pg_monitor role |