Re: Death postgres

From: Marc Millas <marc(dot)millas(at)mokadb(dot)com>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Death postgres
Date: 2023-05-06 12:25:31
Message-ID: CADX_1aY1KtOYZaOB8F4KdHgDh7E1bbMkmNciOHc8xt2Y3=hYWg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Le sam. 6 mai 2023 à 06:18, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> a
écrit :

> On 5/5/23 18:14, Marc Millas wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > postgres 14.2 on Linux redhat
> >
> > temp_file_limit set around 210 GB.
> >
> > a select request with 2 left join have crashed the server (oom killer)
> > after the postgres disk occupation did grow from 15TB to 16 TB.
>
> The result of EXPLAIN <the query> would be helpful.
> Sure!
>
But. One of the table looks "inaccessible" since.
Ie. Even explain select * from the_table didnt answer and must be killed by
control c

> >
> > What are the cases where postgres may grow without caring about
> > temp_file_limit ?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Marc MILLAS
> > Senior Architect
> > +33607850334
> > www.mokadb.com <http://www.mokadb.com>
> >
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Evgeny Morozov 2023-05-06 12:29:36 Re: "PANIC: could not open critical system index 2662" - twice
Previous Message Marc Millas 2023-05-06 12:19:49 Re: Death postgres