Re: Performance benchmark of PG

From: Manish Lad <manishlad7893(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance benchmark of PG
Date: 2021-07-19 11:09:30
Message-ID: CADPrz79xpV5z31VnO2A6m-pnhUUPmqmHYpzXosRMW7+91o4myg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Yes you are right. I also experienced same in one such migration from db2
to PG which had read faster but the write was not meeting the need.

We then noticed the differences in disk types.

Once changed it matched the source.

Thanks and Regards

Manish

On Mon, 19 Jul 2021, 16:34 Laurenz Albe, <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:

> On Mon, 2021-07-19 at 15:39 +0530, Manish Lad wrote:
> > We are planning to migrate Oracle exadata database to postgresql and db
> size ranges from 1 tb to 60 TB.
> >
> > Will the PG support this with the performance matching to that of
> exadata applince?
> > If anyone could point me in the right direction where i xan get the
> benchmarking done
> > for these two databases either on prime or any cloud would be great.
>
> You won't find any trustworthy benchmarks anywhere, because Oracle
> expressedly
> forbids publishing of benchmark results in its license, unless Oracle has
> given
> its permission.
>
> The question cannot be answered, because performance depends on your
> workload,
> configuration, software and hardware. Perhaps PostgreSQL will be faster,
> perhaps not.
>
> Test and see.
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
> --
> Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hüseyin Demir 2021-07-19 11:17:51 Re: Performance benchmark of PG
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2021-07-19 11:04:35 Re: Performance benchmark of PG