From: | Anoop K <anoopk6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Venkatraju TV <venkatraju(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: REINDEX deadlock - Postgresql -9.1 |
Date: | 2013-02-07 08:38:51 |
Message-ID: | CADK_1hJySR6G1kZuj_tvhpm2PmVUhmetQOrb5yTdj2Nh-8u7qQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I have the setup in problem state. But I am not able to make psql
connections to view the lock details.
psql connections are hanging. Is there any other info which can be
collected in this state ?
Also we don't know the steps to reproduce the issue.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>wrote:
> Anoop K wrote:
> > We are hitting a situation where REINDEX is resulting in postgresql to
> go to dead lock state for ever.
> > On debugging the issue we found that
> > 3 connections are going in to some dead lock state.
> >
> > 1. idle in transaction
> > 2. REINDEX waiting
> > 3. SELECT waiting
> >
> > All these connections are made in the same minute. Once in deadlock
> state we are not able to make new
> > connections to db.(So not able to view pg_locks also). New connections
> appears as 'startup waiting' in
> > ps output. Initially we suspected <idle in transaction> is the result of
> not closing a connection. But
> > it seems it got stuck after creating a connection and is not able to
> proceed.
> >
> > Any clues ..
>
> Check the contents of pg_locks:
> What locks does the "idle in transaction" session hold?
> Who holds the locks that block SELECT, REINDEX and new connections?
>
> Turn on log_statement='all' to see what the "idle in transaction"
> session did since it started.
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dean Rasheed | 2013-02-07 08:50:52 | Re: DEFERRABLE NOT NULL constraint |
Previous Message | Chris Travers | 2013-02-07 08:23:08 | Re: DEFERRABLE NOT NULL constraint |