From: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, LanChi <lpham2525(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Fwd: BUG #16960: Illegal reflective access operation |
Date: | 2021-05-31 15:46:13 |
Message-ID: | CADK3HHLn7Pn+C-13YCM+B7AfWPf4AFYjWZ=+7dhjJv4Y7sdcVQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Thanks for your response. I have forwarded this to the pgsql-bugs list as
well
Dave Cramer
www.postgres.rocks
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: LanChi <lpham2525(at)gmail(dot)com>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 at 11:14
Subject: Re: BUG #16960: Illegal reflective access operation
To: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks>
Dear Dave,
My JDBC has been updated to 42.2.20 and it fixed the problem. Thank you for
your response.
~LanChi
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 9:55 AM Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks>
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 at 16:30, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>> PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> > I connected my Postgresql server to my Eclipse IDE and this warning
>> popped
>> > up:
>> > WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred
>> > WARNING: Illegal reflective access by org.postgresql.jdbc.TimestampUtils
>> >
>> (file:/C:/Users/LanChi/Desktop/PubHub-StarterKit/WebContent/WEB-INF/lib/postgresql-42.1.1.jar)
>> > to field java.util.TimeZone.defaultTimeZone
>> > WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of
>> > org.postgresql.jdbc.TimestampUtils
>>
>> > I am not sure if this is the right place to report this bug,
>>
>> No, this list is just for reporting problems in the Postgres server
>> proper. I'd suggest reporting it to the pgsql-jdbc mailing list.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>>
> The current version of JDBC is now 42.2.20. I would suggest you start by
> upgrading to the latest version of the driver.
>
> It would also be useful if you provided the version of JAVA you are using.
> To be honest I'm not sure if we have fixed this or not, but I cannot even
> begin to investigate it without this information.
>
> Dave
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-05-31 16:06:06 | Re: XX000: unknown type of jsonb container. |
Previous Message | Dmitry Dolgov | 2021-05-31 14:51:31 | Re: XX000: unknown type of jsonb container. |