From: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: incorrect results and different plan with 2 very similar queries |
Date: | 2024-03-27 22:10:20 |
Message-ID: | CADK3HHLiv-btGRshBhum0sSOM0VaoE9ottzPi-S3sRMNBKKV9A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Cramer
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 17:57, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 at 10:33, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > There is a report on the pgjdbc github JDBC Driver shows erratic
> behavior when filtering on CURRENT_DATE · pgjdbc/pgjdbc · Discussion #3184 (
> github.com)
> >
> > Here are the plans.
> >
> > JDBC - Nested Loop (incorrect result)
> >
> > Index Cond: (mutation >= ((CURRENT_DATE -
> '1971-12-31'::date) - 28))
>
> > JDBC - Hash Right (correct result)
> >
> > Recheck Cond: (mutation >= ((CURRENT_DATE -
> '1971-12-31'::date) - 29))
>
> I don't see any version details or queries, but going by the
> conditions above, the queries don't appear to be the same, so
> different results aren't too surprising and not a demonstration that
> there's any sort of bug.
>
Sorry, you are correct. Version is 12.14. Here is the query
SELECT
p.partseqno_i
, p.partno
, p.partmatch
, pfe.average_price
, pfe.sales_price
, pfe.purch_price
, pfe.average_price_2
, pfe.avg_repair_cost
, pfe.average_price_func
, pfe.fsv
, pfe.fsv_func
, p.status
FROM part p
LEFT JOIN part_fa_entity pfe ON (p.partno = pfe.partno)
WHERE 1=1
AND (p.mutation >= (CURRENT_DATE - '1971-12-31'::date)-27) ORDER BY p.partno
Dave
> David
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2024-03-27 22:13:00 | Re: Large block sizes support in Linux |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2024-03-27 22:09:02 | Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` |