Re: Async client libraries - not worth it?

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Rob Nikander <rob(dot)nikander(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Async client libraries - not worth it?
Date: 2019-06-17 14:00:30
Message-ID: CADK3HHLiX8cMTpFLhwY=Eoe4x-Hwob2qASk-ynxQGgq8RPH3qA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 09:43, Rob Nikander <rob(dot)nikander(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
>
> > On Jun 17, 2019, at 3:57 PM, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
> > […] Postgres can pipeline requests if the client is written correctly so
> it is conceivable that this would be much faster.
>
> Can the JDBC driver do this? I don’t see it documented anywhere.

No, as it's blocking. It's conceivable that we could do it in the batch
stuff .

Dave Cramer

davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2019-06-17 14:11:32 Re: bug regclass::oid
Previous Message Rob Nikander 2019-06-17 13:43:28 Re: Async client libraries - not worth it?