| From: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Pg Docs <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Git is not an acronym |
| Date: | 2021-06-10 13:08:16 |
| Message-ID: | CADK3HHLTWK+1pR7KBT37n=gWVtyM71Y3DhPR5psNPee6Q3ZQmA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 09:04, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> On 6/10/21 7:40 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > Commit 651377933e031 cleaned up references to CVS replacing them with
> Git.
> > Replacing CVS with Git in acronyms.sgml seems a bit incorrect though as
> Git
> > isn't an acronym (but CVS is, hence the original item replaced). We
> also never
> > refer to Git with <acronym /> tags. The attached removes Git from the
> acronyms
> > page.
>
> According to the README[1] and reference in the Wikipedia page that our
> docs point too, "git" can be an acronym based on context. I don't think
> it's harmful to leave it in.
>
Doesn't seem like a nit worth picking to me either.
Dave
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2021-06-10 13:34:11 | Re: Git is not an acronym |
| Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2021-06-10 13:03:57 | Re: Git is not an acronym |