From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: DatabaseMetaData.getTypeInfo() - returns all tables as well |
Date: | 2015-10-19 15:33:24 |
Message-ID: | CADK3HHKwPz9J9TFdOjnwwHRtq0_BtN7_=f6F6WathiVUf=+seQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
This change breaks more than it fixes!
What is your specific problem with returning tables ?
Dave Cramer
davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com
On 1 October 2015 at 08:51, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Sorry, I am not registered with GitHub (nor using it)
>
> Regards
> Thomas
>
> Dave Cramer schrieb am 01.10.2015 um 13:23:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > Any chance you could provide a github pull request ?
> >
> > Dave Cramer
> >
> > dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
> > http://www.credativ.ca
> >
> > On 30 September 2015 at 15:37, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net
> <mailto:spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > DatabaseMetaData.getTypeInfo() returns not only data types, but also
> all table types.
> >
> > Strictly speaking this is correct as the row type for a table is
> indeed a "data type" in Postgres,
> > but I think the information returned is way too much from a
> practical point of view.
> >
> > This could be reduced at least a bit by not only excluding pg_toast,
> but also pg_catalog and information_schema types:
> >
> > SELECT t.typname,t.oid
> > FROM pg_catalog.pg_type t
> > JOIN pg_catalog.pg_namespace n ON (t.typnamespace = n.oid)
> > WHERE n.nspname not in ('pg_toast', 'pg_catalog',
> 'information_schema')
> >
> > (instead of WHERE n.nspname != 'pg_toast' in
> AbstractJdbc2DatabaseMetaData.java getTypeInfo())
> >
> >
> > What I find even more confusing (from a JDBC point of view) is that
> each table type is reported twice:
> >
> > Once with the table's name and once with an underscore prefixing the
> table name, e.g. foo and _foo.
> >
> > These entries map to pg_type rows with typtype = 'c' and 'b'
> respectively.
> >
> > I wonder if it would make sense to filter out the "real" tables from
> this result.
> > And if it does, if there is an efficient way of doing that and not
> removing real composite types
> > from the result at the same time.
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Thomas
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org <mailto:
> pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>)
> > To make changes to your subscription:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2015-10-20 06:07:31 | Re: DatabaseMetaData.getTypeInfo() - returns all tables as well |
Previous Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2015-10-19 12:56:01 | Re: Change of format of returned flat value after prepareThreshold |