From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: JDBC regression tests broken by latest timezone changes |
Date: | 2014-10-25 06:46:50 |
Message-ID: | CADK3HHKr9cjMeW2_fpVzjLESZ8tKjLMfV-yHLKTpuXHwitpQVw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Fixed.
Thanks Tom!
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca
On 22 October 2014 17:24, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> My Salesforce colleagues just pointed out that the JDBC regression
> tests fail against 9.4beta3, because those tests include a check on
> the timezone Europe/Helsinki in 1920, and the latest IANA timezone
> database changed what they think the GMT offset was there/then.
>
> This doubtless explains why buildfarm member piapiac has been unhappy
> since the TZ updates went in, though it sure doesn't provide much
> visibility into the exact failure :-(
>
> I'd counsel following the precedent of commit
> 66b737cd9a72e10df4de1867ae7b675bc48d478c if you want to test
> any fractional-second GMT offsets: use Paris, whose location was
> pretty well established even back then.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2014-10-25 18:21:25 | Re: TIMESTAMP value binary transfer problem |
Previous Message | dhaval jaiswal | 2014-10-23 09:35:30 | Hung thread |