From: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Binary support for pgoutput plugin |
Date: | 2019-11-11 16:15:45 |
Message-ID: | CADK3HHKo2GW=oQeVFM7cjA5GWSJmgON5moV_2pxrZsJQH4PO=g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 at 11:20, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 07:16:10AM -0500, Dave Cramer wrote:
> >
> > See attached
>
> --- a/src/backend/replication/logical/worker.c
> +++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/worker.c
> @@ -1779,6 +1779,7 @@ ApplyWorkerMain(Datum main_arg)
> options.slotname = myslotname;
> options.proto.logical.proto_version = LOGICALREP_PROTO_VERSION_NUM;
> options.proto.logical.publication_names =
> MySubscription->publications;
> + options.proto.logical.binary = MySubscription->binary;
>
> I'm a bit confused, shouldn't be there also
>
> --- a/src/backend/catalog/pg_subscription.c
> +++ b/src/backend/catalog/pg_subscription.c
> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ GetSubscription(Oid subid, bool missing_ok)
> sub->name = pstrdup(NameStr(subform->subname));
> sub->owner = subform->subowner;
> sub->enabled = subform->subenabled;
> + sub->binary = subform->subbinary;
>
> in the GetSubscription?
>
yes, I have added this. I will supply an updated patch later.
Now a bigger question(s).
Previously someone mentioned that we need to confirm whether the two
servers are compatible for binary or not.
Checking to make sure the two servers have the same endianness is obvious.
Sizeof int, long, float, double, timestamp (float/int) at a minimum.
this could be done in libpqrcv_startstreaming. The question I have
remaining is do we fall back to text mode if needed or simply fail ?
Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2019-11-11 16:48:25 | Re: TestLib::command_fails_like enhancement |
Previous Message | Liudmila Mantrova | 2019-11-11 16:00:22 | Re: Does 'instead of delete' trigger support modification of OLD |