Re: Merge pgjdbc-parent-poms project into pgjdbc please

Pavel,

Unfortunately I do not see a way to solve this. I've done some research on
this and I don't think there are too many people that don't get the driver
through maven repositories or downloading it themselves.

The distro requirements have a fundamental impedance mismatch to the
java/maven ecosystem. I don't think distros can be telling projects how to
organize their code or which tools to use to build them.

I understand your mandate and I sympathize but it does not align with the
jdbc project's mandate.

Regards,

Dave Cramer

davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com

On 2 February 2016 at 12:04, Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:

> On Tuesday 26 of January 2016 16:19:25 Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > To do 5, the most sane way is to split postgresql driver into two: the
> > > driver itself and osgi support (or make pgsql-full and pgsql-no-osgi).
> >
> > Right! Or better to have the split done so that 'pgjdbc' and
> > 'pgjdbc-osgi'. E.g. by inheritance you can "enlarge" the pgjdbc
> > functionality and then depend on 'pgjdbc'. That would be awesome. I
> > would be able to help with packaging of 'pgjdbc-osgi' (not for Fedora
> > repositories of course).
>
> Gently pinging here :). Could we think about something like this? Has
> the discussion with osgi.enterprise guys moved somewhere?
>
> Thanks, Pavel
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>