Re: JDBC 4 Compliance

Currently I am the only committer, (Kris is still but he's not active now)
I would remain that way for a while til I see where this is going.

Dana , have a look at http://jekyllrb.com/

As for other people who have offered help Stephen Nelson has shown some
interest.

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:32 PM, dmp <danap(at)ttc-cmc(dot)net> wrote:

> I have indicated I would be willing to help with the web page, but last
> that
> issue came up the use of Apache Forest was considered the default. After
> reviewing it I thought it was not conducive to a simple approach to
> conveying
> information. I really mean basic information and providing a mechanism to
> convey
> development work. The keys areas for development it seems to me are todos
> and
> patches? Without these being clearly accurate and accessable to individuals
> then no clear goals are communicated.
>
> I would be willing to research as indicated before and alternative to
> Apache
> Forest, but will find a way to use if that remains the default.
>
> ------------------------------**---------
> So may I summarize:
>
> ** LACK of RESOURCES:
>
> 1. Review Patches (Open)
> 2. Maven Deployment, Mike Fowler, Build to be still controlled by Dave?
> 3. Website, Dana Proctor
>
> Kevin Carr in what way would you be willing to contribute, area(s)?
>
> ------------------------------**---------
> ** Now I suppose this will generally address the maintenance of the
> existing
> code, But it does not address the issue of pushing the Driver into
> compliance
> with Java 7, 8, etc. and the forks.
>
> This is where I would like to see the website setup for polling, it seems
> that the conscious seems to be that there should be:
>
> 1. Current pgJDBC to be maintained, but not be pushed forward?
> 2. Fork(s) to be Version 2 for Java 7, 8 support?
>
> danap.
>
>
> Mike Fowler wrote:
>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>>
>>> Moving forward. As I see it the number one problem is lack of resources.
>>> Instead of opting for wholesale change the project needs resources.
>>> Someone else to review patches, someone to work on the website. Someone
>>> to deploy to maven.
>>>
>>> Anyone feel like volunteering ?
>>>
>>>
>> Let me say a thank you to all the work you have done for the JDBC
>> driver. I'm happy to volunteer for both patch review and handling Maven.
>> As I already run the JDBC buildfarm
>> (www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/**show_status.pl?member=piapiac<http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_status.pl?member=piapiac>)
>> I have a
>> stable, repeatable build environment that can be used to make a driver
>> release and push it to Maven. I've not done a push to central before but
>> I have run a number of CI environments with nexus. I recall there being
>> a number of discussions early this year so I'll make a start there.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/**mailpref/pgsql-jdbc<http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc>
>