Re: Unable to allocate 2G of shared memory on wheezy

From: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unable to allocate 2G of shared memory on wheezy
Date: 2014-06-18 19:33:58
Message-ID: CADK3HHKbfP9J0bEp1GSqrkJKU7o+sU+_gTrnV0KzvWwPR0=AgQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Problem solved... a runaway process (puppet) had consumed all available
real memory

Dave Cramer

On 18 June 2014 15:24, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> 2014-06-18 13:37:15 EDT FATAL: could not map anonymous shared memory:
> Cannot allocate memory
> 2014-06-18 13:37:15 EDT HINT: This error usually means that PostgreSQL's
> request for a shared memory segment exceeded available memory or swap
> space. To reduce the request size (currently 8826445824 bytes), reduce
> PostgreSQL's shared memory usage, perhaps by reducing shared_buffers or
> max_connections.
>
> ipcs -m
>
> ------ Shared Memory Segments --------
> key shmid owner perms bytes nattch status
>
>
>
> Dave Cramer
>
>
> On 18 June 2014 15:15, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>> Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> > To reduce the request size [FAILently 2232950784 bytes), reduce
>> > PostgreSQL's shared memory usage,
>>
>> This error message is a bit garbled :-(. It would've been useful
>> to know the specific errno, but you've trimmed out that info.
>>
>> Perhaps it's failing because you already have ~10G in shared memory
>> segments? "sudo ipcs -m" might be illuminating.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-06-18 19:37:27 Re: Unable to allocate 2G of shared memory on wheezy
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2014-06-18 19:24:45 Re: Unable to allocate 2G of shared memory on wheezy