Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq

From: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Matthieu Garrigues <matthieu(dot)garrigues(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Date: 2020-11-03 13:20:03
Message-ID: CADK3HHKZ5uagbFs2-VFyQU30+VOVZ30VdU-4UQkrSmFkT-tFbQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro,

On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 10:57, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:

> On 2020-Nov-02, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > In v23 I've gone over docs; discovered that PQgetResults docs were
> > missing the new values. Added those. No significant other changes yet.
>
>
>
Thanks for looking at this.

What else does it need to get it in shape to apply?

Dave Cramer
www.postgres.rocks

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-11-03 13:42:34 Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2020-11-03 13:19:18 Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput?