From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Wooten <kdubb(at)me(dot)com> |
Cc: | REBruchs <REBruchs(at)cfl(dot)rr(dot)com>, dmp <danap(at)ttc-cmc(dot)net>, PostgreSQL JDBC <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: JDBC 4 Compliance |
Date: | 2013-06-23 10:42:25 |
Message-ID: | CADK3HHKLY4XAojuRei6EnNd2z-YLS7ZO3996g04hzKNGdVzwHA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Robert,
What are you looking for here. I'm not sure that the protocol provides the
information to determine if a column is generated. Generated could mean
many things....
If on the other hand you just want adherence to the spec and adding the
column in with a "" as undetermined that seems trivial
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Kevin Wooten <kdubb(at)me(dot)com> wrote:
> I cannot speak to when the main driver will add JDBC 4.1 features. I can
> say that my alternate driver, the project I linked to previously, does
> adhere to JDBC 4.1 for the features it implements. You may want to try it
> out and see if it works for you as its only 2 glaring JDBC feature
> omissions are updatable result-sets and call statements.
>
> On Jun 22, 2013, at 7:34 PM, REBruchs <REBruchs(at)cfl(dot)rr(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Kevin,
> >
> > Thanks for pointing that out.
> > I noticed the same also. You are also probably aware of the recent
> turmoil
> > regarding the security problems with Java and Oracle's efforts to push at
> > least Java 7u21 and preferably Java 7u25 to the masses.
> >
> > Oracle has stated that Java 6u45 has been archived and recommends Java 7.
> >
> > My original email was not sent as a complaint, but more as an inquiry as
> to
> > when the PostgreSQL JDBC4 driver (that more closely adheres to the Java 7
> > JDBC API) might be made available to the development community.
> >
> > I am a long time PostgreSQL and PostgreSQL JDBC driver user and have been
> > quite happy with PostgreSQL for quite some time now.
> >
> > Thank you for your timely responses, and I applaud your efforts and the
> > efforts of other JDBC driver team members in continuing to provide
> > developers of Java/PostgreSQL applications a quality JDBC driver.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Robert Bruchs
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kevin Wooten [mailto:kdubb(at)me(dot)com]
> > Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 6:19 PM
> > To: REBruchs
> > Cc: 'dmp'; 'PostgreSQL JDBC'
> > Subject: Re: [JDBC] JDBC 4 Compliance
> >
> > Yes. You are referencing the Java 7 documentation which, as I referenced
> > previously, is JDBC 4.1; the mainstream driver does not currently only
> > covers JDBC 4.
> >
> > If you look at the same Java 6 docs
> > (http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/sql/DatabaseMetaData.html
> ),
> > which is JDBC 4, you'll see that there is no 24th column.
> >
> >
> > On Jun 22, 2013, at 1:50 PM, REBruchs <REBruchs(at)cfl(dot)rr(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >> Please see the Oracle JAVA SE API documentation at
> >> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/sql/DatabaseMetaData.html
> >>
> >> Refer to method getColumns(), column 24 IS_GENERATEDCOLUMN
> >>
> >> Thanks for looking into this.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Kevin Wooten [mailto:kdubb(at)me(dot)com]
> >> Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 2:13 PM
> >> To: dmp
> >> Cc: REBruchs; PostgreSQL JDBC
> >> Subject: Re: [JDBC] JDBC 4 Compliance
> >>
> >> This column is defined in JDBC 4.1 which is not supported by the driver.
> >>
> >> It is supported in my separate implementation of the driver. pgjdbc-ng
> >> <https://github.com/kdubb/pgjdbc-ng>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jun 22, 2013, at 9:49 AM, dmp <danap(at)ttc-cmc(dot)net> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> It does not appear that method in the Java Docs defines such a
> >> column, IS_GENERATEDCOLUMN, to be returned. The code also does
> >> not indicated any such column. IS_AUTOINCREMENT maybe? Can you
> >> please clarify?
> >>
> >> danap.
> >>
> >> REBruchs wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> The 9.2-1002 JDBC 4 driver version does not appear to
> >> provide the
> >> IS_GENERATEDCOLUMN column in the ResultSet returned by
> >>
> >> ResultSet DatabaseMetaData.getColumns(String catalog,
> >> String schemaPattern,
> >> String tableNamePattern,
> >> String columnNamePattern)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> >> To make changes to your subscription:
> >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> >> To make changes to your subscription:
> >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | dmp | 2013-06-23 16:32:54 | Re: JDBC 4 Compliance |
Previous Message | Kevin Wooten | 2013-06-23 02:53:17 | Re: JDBC 4 Compliance |