| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Georgy Pruss <gpruss(at)ksf(dot)kiev(dot)ua>, Hiroshi Saito <hiroshi(at)winpg(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psqlODBC 10.01.0000 Released -- what about 9.6.6? |
| Date: | 2018-01-10 20:44:30 |
| Message-ID: | CADK3HHKL7D2uWqJgdDOObN0rg_pHPN4z_fgz2B0y2MosiKO7=A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
On 10 January 2018 at 15:37, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 18:16 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > So you have all the materials at hand to compile by yourself past
> versions.
>
> I don't think we should recommend users compiling from source.
>
> Maybe we should just bite the bullet, and increase ODBC version number to
> 42,
> like JDBC folks did.
>
We patented that move :)
>
> That would solve this (and some more) confusion.
>
It has not been that bad..
Regards,
Dave Cramer
davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Grant Shirreffs | 2018-01-11 00:17:07 | Bug in is_setting_search_path |
| Previous Message | Devrim Gündüz | 2018-01-10 20:37:37 | Re: psqlODBC 10.01.0000 Released -- what about 9.6.6? |