| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Nelson <stephen(at)eccostudio(dot)com> |
| Cc: | List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Buildfarm test failures on JDK 5 |
| Date: | 2014-05-16 12:22:58 |
| Message-ID: | CADK3HHKBrzLQtmA3McXA2fT=_N_taUjEpzHPvvft6Fwv6r=PWg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
I'm of the opinion that we backpatch any bugs below 1.7
new code works with 1.7 and up
thoughts ?
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca
On 16 May 2014 07:29, Stephen Nelson <stephen(at)eccostudio(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > With java 1.5 eol quite a while ago I am wondering if we shouldn't stop
> > writing code for it ?
> >
> > Thoughts ?
>
> Unless any organisation requires Java 5 support I'd tend to agree that
> new code shouldn't support it. What's the driver policy on supporting
> Java versions given that 8 is now out?
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Glenn Holmer | 2014-05-16 13:16:14 | Re: Buildfarm test failures on JDK 5 |
| Previous Message | Stephen Nelson | 2014-05-16 11:29:07 | Re: Buildfarm test failures on JDK 5 |