Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq

From: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Matthieu Garrigues <matthieu(dot)garrigues(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Date: 2020-09-21 12:38:07
Message-ID: CADK3HHKA+m1_A_Da7z=qXwNdLzPsrJSSievwMCSzkhdShXfJcg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro,

On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 at 17:26, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:

> On 2020-Aug-31, Matthieu Garrigues wrote:
>
> > It seems like this patch is nearly finished. I fixed all the remaining
> > issues. I'm also asking a confirmation of the test scenarios you want
> > to see in the next version of the patch.
>
> Hmm, apparently nobody noticed that this patch is not registered in the
> current commitfest.
>
> Since it was submitted ahead of the deadline, I'm going to add it there.
> (The patch has also undergone a lot of review already; it's certainly
> not a newcomer.)
>

I am looking for this in the commitfest and can't find it. However there is
an old commitfest entry

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/13/1024/

Do you have the link for the new one ?

Dave Cramer
www.postgres.rocks

>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Sharma 2020-09-21 12:57:03 Re: Logical replication from PG v13 and below to PG v14 (devel version) is not working.
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2020-09-21 12:15:18 Re: Yet another fast GiST build