Re: PostgreSQL gaps wrt to java, and jdbc

Looking at the backend code. One possibility is to just use compression to
send it over?

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca

On 6 July 2015 at 12:35, Markus KARG <markus(at)headcrashing(dot)eu> wrote:

> Binary represenation of XML and JSON instead of converting it to a String
> BEFORE transmission. Both JSON and XML essentially are graphs, and can be
> inflated with whitespace on the driver side AFTER transmission. Same in the
> other direction (deflate by transmitting binary object graph instead of
> whitespace-inflated String representation).
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:
> pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] *On Behalf Of *Dave Cramer
> *Sent:* Montag, 6. Juli 2015 14:15
> *To:* List
> *Subject:* [JDBC] PostgreSQL gaps wrt to java, and jdbc
>
>
>
> I have been actively maintaining the driver off and on since 1999 or so.
> Recently we have had a flurry of activity and one of the things I noticed
> was the surprise that PostgreSQL didn't support X or did Y in some
> unexpected way. Sometimes we are a bit too complacent, and accept things
> the way they are.
>
>
>
> I am wondering what could the server do better that would help JDBC?
>
>
>
> Obviously streaming a column is one. Possibly rowid's. Anything else ?
>
>
>
>
> Dave Cramer
>