Re: Time for a new release?

nm I figured it out, I can just revert one commit after the merge

Dave Cramer

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> So what git hub is doing is just checking out REL_9_3_STABLE then merging
> master . Is there a way to specify where it starts from ?
>
> Dave Cramer
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <
> hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Looks good to me, except that you don't want to merge the change to bump
>> the version number to 9.4-X to the REL9_3_STABLE branch.
>>
>>
>> On 02/13/2014 01:44 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:
>>
>>> Heikki
>>>
>>> I just created a PR https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/118 which will
>>> merge master into 93_STABLE can you look through it to make sure it's
>>> sane
>>>
>>> Dave Cramer
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:38 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It's been a while since 9.3-1100, would it be time for a new minor
>>>>> release? In particular, some VMware people are eager to get the
>>>>> setQueryTimeout fixes (commit
>>>>> fa078d6390d8b1c95b63cb65a801272c6bce9244)
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there anything I can do to help with making the release?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please note that we are releasing new PG versions next week. It would be
>>>> very good if you do the JDBC release just before that, to help the
>>>> packagers' lives easier.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> --
>>>> Devrim GÜNDÜZ
>>>> Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>> PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
>>>> Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> - Heikki
>>
>
>