| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Nelson <stephen(at)eccostudio(dot)com> |
| Cc: | dmp <danap(at)ttc-cmc(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL JDBC <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Website Redo Kick Off |
| Date: | 2013-07-10 22:54:54 |
| Message-ID: | CADK3HHJx_hHLddczjxZ_e_WWnRqbMNd1C8JVbXVHMc+=zAPodA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Dana,
I think you gave us too many choices!
If I had to choose it would be jekyll only because of the inertia from the
github folks
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Stephen Nelson <stephen(at)eccostudio(dot)com>wrote:
> Echoing what Heikki said, I personally haven't used any of the site
> generators mentioned. However the solution does need to be a simple git
> checkout and with minimal dependencies you can make updates. I've tried to
> get the current site doc generated a few times without much luck in
> generating some of the pages. So definitely simplicity rules.
>
> I believe github uses Jekyll and it supports the markdown syntax that is
> easy to understand and used on github. But I haven't used it so can't vouch
> for its ease of use or popularity.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Stephen
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steven Schlansker | 2013-07-10 23:29:28 | Re: Website Redo Kick Off |
| Previous Message | Stephen Nelson | 2013-07-10 19:29:55 | Re: Website Redo Kick Off |