From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Kjäll <alexander(dot)kjall(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Maybe time for an alpha release of the pgsql2 project |
Date: | 2018-10-29 09:41:46 |
Message-ID: | CADK3HHJv_5UbG6FBVP0mruz8ry-OvggQgAJCW8ueq-vg-aUQzA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 at 10:38, Alexander Kjäll <alexander(dot)kjall(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm not totally sure if this is the best place for this topic, but as
> the library was briefly discussed on the list before I'll continue
> that tradition.
>
> There is still a lot more work to be done on the adba driver for
> postgresql, and the adba specification from oracle is still subject to
> change.
>
> But the driver have also come a long way and is in a state where it
> would be useful to be able to experiment with it in external projects,
> and therefore I'm feeling that it's time for a first alpha release.
>
> I have a number of questions regading naming and procedure and stuff like
> that.
>
> 1) I feel that the name pgsql2 isn't optimal, maybe change it to pgAdba.
>
Ya, I'm not particularly happy with that name either.
>
> 2) Do you want to publish the artifact under the org.postgresql
> groupId to maven central?
>
Hmmm .... that is fine however I guess someone with access to that groupId
would have to push it.
I think I'm OK with this.
>
> 3) Any opinion on version numbering? I was thinking that 0.1.0-ALPHA
> could be appropriate.
>
Yes, this is fine with me
Dave
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chad Retz | 2018-10-30 01:13:31 | Re: Maybe time for an alpha release of the pgsql2 project |
Previous Message | Alexander Kjäll | 2018-10-28 14:38:28 | Maybe time for an alpha release of the pgsql2 project |