| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Charles Pritchard <chuck(at)jumis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: revisiting unix domain sockets |
| Date: | 2013-12-17 12:25:27 |
| Message-ID: | CADK3HHJrM3e5i2ST0NC87t00oh+Y07jWAnuiis-bEjBk+SH0eQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Send a PR and I'll look at it.
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Charles Pritchard <chuck(at)jumis(dot)com> wrote:
> Has there been any movement and-or push back around supporting unix domain
> sockets within the connection string? I've seen simple patches on the web
> to add support- it seems like a trivial matter, is there a design
> consideration or other issue outstanding?
>
> Example of using JNA for unix domain sockets:
> http://www.productivity.org/projects/mysqlunixsocket/
> MysqlUnixSocketFactory.java
>
> -Charles
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Emmanuel GUITON | 2013-12-19 09:33:44 | "This ResultSet is closed" exception on a PreparedStatement getMetaData() |
| Previous Message | Charles Pritchard | 2013-12-17 11:01:42 | revisiting unix domain sockets |