Re: Maven Artifact JDK Suffix

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Mark Rotteveel <mark(at)lawinegevaar(dot)nl>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Maven Artifact JDK Suffix
Date: 2016-01-15 13:37:23
Message-ID: CADK3HHJhb=6MHDM23W3rFDYgwcWLPtErxYtBhCO34XHyJA6vuw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Is there a technical reason to have a 2 digit number ?

Dave Cramer

davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com

On 15 January 2016 at 08:35, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Well, if multi-release javadocs/sources/debugging are not supported,
> then I would prefer jreXY versions.
>
> So what about renaming jre6 -> jre06, jre7 -> jre07, nosuffix -> jre08?
>
> Vladimir
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vladimir Sitnikov 2016-01-15 13:38:49 Re: Maven Artifact JDK Suffix
Previous Message Vladimir Sitnikov 2016-01-15 13:35:32 Re: Maven Artifact JDK Suffix