Re: JDBC 4 Compliance

What is missing to get to JDBC 4.X ? Does anyone have a reasonable gap
analysis ? By reasonable I mean things that can be implemented in
postgresql ?

Also there is talk of two code bases. How would that work. Is Kevin's code
going to move over to the pgjdbc project and be refactored into the
org.postgresql packages ?

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:48 PM, David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:

> Bryan Varner wrote
> >> Since "transition" is necessary so are the politics.
> >
> > Bull.
> >
> > What's bothering me is not politics. What's bothering me is the giant
> > vacuum of direction. There is no long-term goal. There's no plan to EOL
> > or sunset support for specific combinations of systems. There's no
> > structure or path for incorporating new ideas, new talent, or new
> > features into the project.
> >
> > The defacto leader right now is Dave, and his calls for action have come
> > up empty handed so far. There's been calls to create a managing 'board'
> > (for lack of better words) to manage the political process, and so far,
> > no one has actually *done* anything. It's the lack of action, on all
> > accounts, which is truly bothering me.
>
> My general thoughts stand; I'll leave it to individuals to decide to what
> extent my thoughts may apply to them. I do not know any persons or
> projects
> well enough to point fingers; my thoughts are much more theoretical in
> nature.
>
> Also, I would classify being bothered by a lack of direction to be bothered
> by something political. Maybe its semantics but that is where I am coming
> from.
>
> I have lots of ideas, as I am sure others do, but I am not being pressed
> currently and have other aspects of my own house to get in order before I
> could follow-through along this front. I too hope someone can take the
> ball
> and run and move this discussion off of a single e-mail thread and into
> some
> more structured.
>
> David J.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/JDBC-4-Compliance-tp5760468p5761492.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - jdbc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>