Re: Publish artifacts to Maven central

Tom,

It should be up to date. What are you seeing that suggests otherwise ?

Dave

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc> wrote:

> Hi Dave
>
> I was going to submit a patch for the website to add the maven group id
> etc to the download page, but it looks like the pgjdbc/www repo on github
> is out of date.. what's the preferred mechanism for patches to the website?
>
> Cheers
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 6 April 2013 05:33, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I've published 9.2 1002 JDBC4 to sonatype he groupid is org.postgresql
>> and the artefact id is postgresql.
>>
>> I assume this will make it to maven central eventually
>>
>> Dave Cramer
>>
>> dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
>> http://www.credativ.ca
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5 April 2013 01:52, Stephen Nelson <stephen(at)eccostudio(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4 Apr 2013 13:12, "Dave Cramer" <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > However it appears maven forces
>>>> >
>>>> > org/postgresql/postgresql/postgresql-JDBC4-1002.jar
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> From a Maven developers point of view they're not worried about the
>>>> directory structure as they just specify group id, artifact id and version
>>>> in the pom.xml. So you just need to come up with reasonable parameters for
>>>> each of those.
>>>>
>>> The existing artefacts in maven central have a group id of "postgresql",
>>> an artefact id of "postgresql" and a version format of "9.1-901-1.jdbc4".
>>> See e.g.
>>> http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22postgresql%22%20AND%20a%3A%22postgresql%22
>>>
>>> Is there a particular reason to change the all of that at this point? I
>>> know I personally would probably have made the group "org.postgresql" and
>>> the artefact id "jdbc-driver" and maybe specified the jdbc version as a
>>> classifier (although some build systems are a bit funny about classifiers).
>>> But people have been using the existing group and artefact id, so I don't
>>> see much point changing it now.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>
>>
>