| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mark Rotteveel <mark(at)lawinegevaar(dot)nl>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Maven Artifact JDK Suffix |
| Date: | 2016-01-15 13:26:34 |
| Message-ID: | CADK3HHJU5JejQhdi7E527Hk30+y7ZTQpRwfkwXgVXJjZ2xNJWg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Well all of this multi-release jar discussion assumes we would release one.
I'm of the opinion that this may just be more complication. Especially with
only pieces of our code being specific to each java version
Dave Cramer
davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com
On 15 January 2016 at 07:28, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> I wonder how that plays with "javadoc & source" jars.
>
> I'm inclined to adding ".jre8" as qualifier.
>
> Vladimir
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2016-01-15 13:35:32 | Re: Maven Artifact JDK Suffix |
| Previous Message | Mark Rotteveel | 2016-01-15 13:15:01 | Re: Maven Artifact JDK Suffix |