| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Markus Reiterer <markus(dot)reiterer(at)prepress-digital(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: JDBC 4.2 - JSR 310 |
| Date: | 2014-12-17 21:18:15 |
| Message-ID: | CADK3HHJT1gas7kzYCnoaa+0TE7Txc+_r2odnCXRtVSQC3ovZ4g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Of course this can influenced. Please contact me off list if this is
something you would like to see happen.
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca
On 17 December 2014 at 16:16, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 12/17/2014 11:02 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:
> >
> > It currently isn't on the roadmap, but it should be.
>
> Of course, the roadmap is just virtual paper. If what you're really
> asking is "do you plan to implement JDBC 4.2 java.time support" ...
> well, like everything in PgJDBC that's down to time and resources.
>
> I have no plans to implement it at this time, nor any current
> engagements to implement it for a client.
>
> I cannot speak for Dave.
>
> --
> Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | rapidtransit440 | 2014-12-18 11:56:58 | Re: Infinite waitOnLock |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2014-12-17 21:16:10 | Re: JDBC 4.2 - JSR 310 |