From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | John Harvey <john(dot)harvey(at)crunchydata(dot)com> |
Cc: | List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Are pgrpm changes for JDBC discussed here before submission? |
Date: | 2015-12-30 20:11:29 |
Message-ID: | CADK3HH+dCB7rsGjeY4CRi0ditOGhKh9HE6+dN1HGGf+rXSaOwg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
John,
No, that file does not exist any more. All documentation exists in the www
repo now
Dave Cramer
davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com
On 30 December 2015 at 15:10, John Harvey <john(dot)harvey(at)crunchydata(dot)com>
wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> That sounds good to me. The github tarball will work just fine-- I just
> wanted to make sure that it was an intended change since it looks a little
> different.
>
> I think RPM-wise that covers everything except for one last question,
> about this file:
> doc/pgjdbc.xml
>
> I think this was a docbook that used to be created from all of the
> javadocs in the ant builds. I don't see that in the current build (note
> that I am running with -Prelease-artifacts to generate html files). Is
> that something that needs to be fixed? If so, I could take a stab at it.
>
> Regards,
> -John
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Download zip file from github would work, no ? I can switch back but was
>> trying to use maven for everything. This is the source file that it provides
>>
>> Dave Cramer
>>
>> davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
>> www.postgresintl.com
>>
>> On 30 December 2015 at 14:51, John Harvey <john(dot)harvey(at)crunchydata(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Dave. I'll have to try that out; it might be what we need.
>>>
>>> Devin- I'll try to get you a spec file by tomorrow for testing if that's
>>> all right.
>>>
>>> BTW, I have a question about the latest PGJDBC release.
>>>
>>> On the downloads page (https://jdbc.postgresql.org/download.html) all
>>> of the previous "source" items are tar.gz files, whereas for this release,
>>> it's a sources jarfile. Is this going to be a permanent switch? If so, I
>>> have a concern because the sources jar does not appear to contain the pom
>>> file for compilation. Typically the RPM code uses a source tarball as a
>>> starting point. Just curious if that's going to be hosted somewhere.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> -John
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> seems there is an rpm for maven
>>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7532928/how-do-i-install-maven-with-yum
>>>>
>>>> Dave Cramer
>>>>
>>>> davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
>>>> www.postgresintl.com
>>>>
>>>> On 30 December 2015 at 14:28, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> pgsql-pkg-yum@ is rpm mailing list.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have zero idea about maven. How much effort would it take to RPMify
>>>>> it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you please send the new spec? I can give a try tomorrow.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards, Devrim
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On December 30, 2015 9:16:20 PM GMT+02:00, John Harvey <
>>>>> john(dot)harvey(at)crunchydata(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello Devrim,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've got a functioning spec-file, but I have a question which I think
>>>>>> needs to be answered before contributing my spec-file changes (which I'm
>>>>>> not quite sure how to do for pgrpms-- I couldn't find a mail-list).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The question has to do with the new build being dependent on maven
>>>>>> instead of ant.
>>>>>> Typically, with a spec file it is expected that we could address this
>>>>>> with the following line:
>>>>>> BuildRequires: maven >= 3.0.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, there's a problem. Maven isn't generally packaged as an
>>>>>> RPM. In fact, even the official RHEL docs point to the maven project site
>>>>>> for installation, and that's via tarball unzipping. I found an abandoned
>>>>>> java project where somebody tried RPM-ing maven, but they abandoned the
>>>>>> project somewhere with maven 2.x, and personally I could not get it to
>>>>>> build.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, I figured I'd try another approach. The other method that I've
>>>>>> seen for setting a dependency is to do something like the following:
>>>>>> BuildRequires: /usr/bin/mvn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, even that doesn't work for me. I keep getting that the
>>>>>> dependency isn't found, when it's definitely there on my system. Note that
>>>>>> I have seen that syntax under a "Requires" line (not BuildRequires) in a
>>>>>> couple of spec files before, but they were in an ifdef block, so they may
>>>>>> not have even been a valid syntax that was tested.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess I'm not sure what the right approach here is. If I leave the
>>>>>> maven dependency off, that's not the correct answer, as it's definitely a
>>>>>> requirement (more specifically, maven 3.x). However, I'm not sure what I
>>>>>> can do to make the spec-file recognize this build dependency.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note that I'm happy to take this to another list if that's
>>>>>> appropriate, or have an offline discussion if that makes sense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>> -John
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, *building* RPMs are PITA nowadays, so until we get a stable
>>>>>>> build, I would prefer this list to catch your attention.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards, Devrim
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On December 30, 2015 6:20:40 PM GMT+02:00, Dave Cramer <
>>>>>>> pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We don't have anything to do with the RPMS
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dave Cramer
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
>>>>>>>> www.postgresintl.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 30 December 2015 at 11:03, John Harvey <
>>>>>>>> john(dot)harvey(at)crunchydata(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have created some changes to the pgrpm repository (git://
>>>>>>>>> git.postgresql.org/git/pgrpms.git) in order to support the maven
>>>>>>>>> changes that went into PGJDBC REL9.4.1207. The changes allow for the
>>>>>>>>> proper generation of RPMS for RHEL6 / 7. Before I submit the changes to
>>>>>>>>> pgrpm, I was wondering if those changes are discussed in the community
>>>>>>>>> here, or if they're discussed solely with the team that works on the pgrpm
>>>>>>>>> repository?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'd be more than happy to share my changes here if it's worth a
>>>>>>>>> discussion.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> -John
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adam Rauch | 2015-12-30 21:45:17 | Recent backward compatibility break in PreparedStatement.setObject() |
Previous Message | John Harvey | 2015-12-30 20:10:00 | Re: Are pgrpm changes for JDBC discussed here before submission? |