From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Campbell, Lance" <lance(at)illinois(dot)edu> |
Cc: | "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Version question |
Date: | 2016-03-14 13:28:19 |
Message-ID: | CADK3HH+c=F9D_mLxg12hnHrt_4h1b92J4L166yh6LjXn7X=55A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Hi Lance,
You are correct, historically they have. While there may have been a good
reason before, there is not one now other than confusion. I'd really like
to break the cycle.
Just use the latest version on 9.5, it will work fine
Dave Cramer
davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com
On 14 March 2016 at 09:24, Campbell, Lance <lance(at)illinois(dot)edu> wrote:
> Thanks for all of the great work on developing the JDBC drivers for
> PostgreSQL.
>
>
>
> I noticed that on the JDBC Driver download page the newest major version
> is 9.4 . I thought in the past that when a newer major version of
> PostgreSQL is released there is a corresponding major version released of
> the JDBC driver. I have been watch for a 9.5 release. Is there
> traditionally a matching version between PostgreSQL and JDBC? Or am I
> wrong. Maybe they do not go hand in hand. I am just checking.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Lance Campbell
>
> Web Services
>
> University of Illinois
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2016-03-14 13:37:34 | Re: documentation issue |
Previous Message | Campbell, Lance | 2016-03-14 13:24:45 | Version question |