Re: Version question

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: "Campbell, Lance" <lance(at)illinois(dot)edu>
Cc: "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Version question
Date: 2016-03-14 13:28:19
Message-ID: CADK3HH+c=F9D_mLxg12hnHrt_4h1b92J4L166yh6LjXn7X=55A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Hi Lance,

You are correct, historically they have. While there may have been a good
reason before, there is not one now other than confusion. I'd really like
to break the cycle.

Just use the latest version on 9.5, it will work fine

Dave Cramer

davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com

On 14 March 2016 at 09:24, Campbell, Lance <lance(at)illinois(dot)edu> wrote:

> Thanks for all of the great work on developing the JDBC drivers for
> PostgreSQL.
>
>
>
> I noticed that on the JDBC Driver download page the newest major version
> is 9.4 . I thought in the past that when a newer major version of
> PostgreSQL is released there is a corresponding major version released of
> the JDBC driver. I have been watch for a 9.5 release. Is there
> traditionally a matching version between PostgreSQL and JDBC? Or am I
> wrong. Maybe they do not go hand in hand. I am just checking.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Lance Campbell
>
> Web Services
>
> University of Illinois
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2016-03-14 13:37:34 Re: documentation issue
Previous Message Campbell, Lance 2016-03-14 13:24:45 Version question