| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mike Blackwell <mike(dot)blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruno Harbulot <bruno(at)distributedmatter(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...) |
| Date: | 2015-05-19 17:25:31 |
| Message-ID: | CADK3HH+MLV9JfFGZy2F_NNTBBpCZUpTM7tq+m7B4Wi=hSQr+OQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca
On 19 May 2015 at 13:15, Mike Blackwell <mike(dot)blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com> wrote:
> A Google search suggests Oracle 9.x supports a unary '?' operator (fuzzy
> match), so the use of '?' in an operator name is not without precedent.
>
Interesting argument. There is considerable precedent where we take the
position that just because xyz supports it we don't.
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-05-19 17:35:14 | Re: a few thoughts on the schedule |
| Previous Message | Mike Blackwell | 2015-05-19 17:15:14 | Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...) |