Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Pavel Kajaba <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com>, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Cramer <notifications(at)github(dot)com>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)
Date: 2016-01-08 14:22:05
Message-ID: CADK3HH+JkGViAGgQLBHpX3OGjqoY4+HT_HuyPoxv2no6cvGtLA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On 8 January 2016 at 09:18, Pavel Kajaba <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 08:36 -0500, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> OK, that makes sense. So here are the options AFAICT.
>
> I guess you could use make and create a makefile to compile it. It should
> not be difficult.
>
> I gather you would also have to compile the preprocessing tool as well ?
>
>
> Sure, we can compile preprocessing easy, but we a problem in that tool.
>
> However pgjdbc is stable project and we think that it's not good idea to
> depend on such small project
>

That decision has already been made. Unless you have a different
preprocessing tool. We are unlikely to revert back to the previous code.

If the project were ever to go away, we could just write our own. It's not
a huge job.

>
>
> How are other java projects that use maven ever included in a distro ?
> Tomcat ?
>
>
> Fedora has tooling which resolves maven dependencies from fedora
> repositories. However in RHEL
> we want to minimalize number of packages, which will be shipped with RHEL.
>

So if you can resolve maven dependencies then I'm confused. What is the
problem then?

Dave Cramer

davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com

>
> Dave Cramer
>
> davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
> www.postgresintl.com
>
> On 8 January 2016 at 08:32, Pavel Kajaba <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
>
> ant is not problem.
>
> there was problem with some ant-maven plugin. Plugin was added because new
> dependencies (my guess is OSGi and waffle-jna).
>
> Correct me if I am wrong - I am not java hacker.
>
> Pavel Kajaba
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave Cramer" <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
> To: "Pavel Raiskup" <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com>
> Cc: "Pavel Kajaba" <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com>, "Vladimir Sitnikov" <
> sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, "List" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Dave
> Cramer" <notifications(at)github(dot)com>, "Devrim GÜNDÜZ" <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2016 7:56:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [JDBC] [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step
> (#435)
>
> 9.3.1201 which was still built using ant
>
> Dave Cramer
>
> davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
> www.postgresintl.com
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-01-08 14:55:54 Fwd: [BUGS] BUG #13856: JDBC driver 1207 not picking up properties
Previous Message Pavel Kajaba 2016-01-08 14:18:39 Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)