Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support

From: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Anthony Roberts <anthony(dot)roberts(at)linaro(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Lina Iyer <lina(dot)iyer(at)linaro(dot)org>, Mike Holmes <mike(dot)holmes(at)linaro(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support
Date: 2024-02-09 19:23:46
Message-ID: CADK3HH+5xK3=X+3TabGhZFkrUXqL+F7O3hzO6dHAFKwvrLGQ2w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave Cramer
www.postgres.rocks

On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 07:18, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 00:26, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 07:01:49AM -0500, Dave Cramer wrote:
>> > Thanks, this patch works and
>> > testing with meson passes.
>>
>> Only with the version posted at [1]? Interesting, that's the same
>> contents as v8 posted upthread, minus src/tools/ because we don't need
>> to care about them anymore.
>>
>> Andrew, what's happening on the test side? It does not seem you've
>> mentioned any details about what is going wrong, or I have just missed
>> them.
>>
>> > I'll try the buildfarm next.
>>
>> [1]:
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ea42654a-3dc4-98b0-335b-56b7ec5e5687@dunslane.net
>
>
> interestingly meson test does not produce any error
> The buildfarm produces the following error for me:
>
> -SELECT relname, attname, coltypes, get_columns_length(coltypes)
> - FROM check_columns
> - WHERE get_columns_length(coltypes) % 8 != 0 OR
> - 'name'::regtype::oid = ANY(coltypes);
> - relname | attname | coltypes | get_columns_length
> ----------+---------+----------+--------------------
> -(0 rows)
> -
> +server closed the connection unexpectedly
> + This probably means the server terminated abnormally
> + before or while processing the request.
> +connection to server was lost
>

Actually digging some more, here is the actual error

2024-02-09 13:31:11.008 -05 postmaster[10672] LOG: server process (PID
11204) was terminated by exception 0xC0000005
2024-02-09 13:31:11.008 -05 postmaster[10672] DETAIL: Failed process was
running: VACUUM;
2024-02-09 13:31:11.008 -05 postmaster[10672] HINT: See C include file
"ntstatus.h" for a description of the hexadecimal value.
2024-02-09 13:31:11.008 -05 postmaster[10672] LOG: terminating any other
active server processes
2024-02-09 13:31:11.013 -05 postmaster[10672] LOG: all server processes
terminated; reinitializing
2024-02-09 13:31:11.034 -05 startup[6152] LOG: database system was
interrupted; last known up at 2024-02-09 13:31:01 -05

Dave

>
> Dave
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2024-02-09 19:24:23 Re: glibc qsort() vulnerability
Previous Message Andres Freund 2024-02-09 19:03:46 Re: GUC-ify walsender MAX_SEND_SIZE constant