Re: Packaging of 9.2-1001 source tarball

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Packaging of 9.2-1001 source tarball
Date: 2012-11-13 23:48:26
Message-ID: CADK3HH+-mGZM2Q9ziWGud60dGMkrPbJsSML06wYWgfmcPMgk+g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Yes, it is a mistake.

Mine

Dave

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> I find that postgresql-jdbc-9.2-1001.src.tar.gz doesn't contain a
> version-numbered top-level directory --- unpacking it just litters
> your current directory with a bunch of files. I hope this is a
> mistake and not new packaging policy.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message dmp 2012-11-14 01:01:49 Re: Packaging of 9.2-1001 source tarball
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-11-13 23:33:19 Packaging of 9.2-1001 source tarball