Re: Hot standby and xlog on a ramdisk

From: Tore Halvorsen <tore(dot)halvorsen(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot standby and xlog on a ramdisk
Date: 2016-02-04 14:46:37
Message-ID: CADGw-SfPiXCVugWFayc=69JCd8CfO-MjXjfv8i4Zgw1ay_iyfA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Scott R Mead <scottm(at)openscg(dot)com> wrote:

> > Can a hot standby run correctly with the xlog-files on a ramdisk?
>> >
>>
>> Yes, but, if you lose any, you'll need to rebuild the standby.
>>
>>
> Even if the master and archive contain all the wal files?
>
> If you have the file somewhere, you're okay, whether it's on the master,
> standby or an archive host. If you're using log-shipping, you'll need all
> the WALs.
>

So, just to verify my understanding. Using a ramdisk for pg_xlog on a hot
standby slave should be ok in all cases as long as the archive and master
retains all wal files that are not applied?

I maintain a fairly active database (>100GB of wal files every day) and
putting the wal files on a ramdisk (only for the slaves of course) helped
quite a lot.

--
Eld på åren og sol på eng gjer mannen fegen og fjåg. [Jøtul]
<demo> Tore Halvorsen || +052 0553034554

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2016-02-04 15:08:41 Re: Hot standby and xlog on a ramdisk
Previous Message Scott R Mead 2016-02-04 14:30:11 Re: Hot standby and xlog on a ramdisk