Re: psql \dh: List High-Level (Root) Tables and Indexes

From: Sadeq Dousti <msdousti(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql \dh: List High-Level (Root) Tables and Indexes
Date: 2025-03-27 22:48:23
Message-ID: CADE6Lvh+Z0aCg-x1RaDUY35w=vGuVv7SL2vs21uru0=09oQ_Aw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I think it's fine the way it is, with regards to v10 check. Can you post a
> rebased patch?
>

Hi Greg,
I just checked here: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5594/
Seems the patch is OK with the latest master, and no rebase is needed.

Do you mean that instead of a diff, I post a patch?

Best regards,
Sadeq

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aidar Imamov 2025-03-27 22:53:29 Re: Add pg_buffercache_evict_all() and pg_buffercache_mark_dirty[_all]() functions
Previous Message Renan Alves Fonseca 2025-03-27 22:29:47 Re: Remove restrictions in recursive query