| From: | Igor ALBUQUERQUE SILVA <i(dot)albuquerque-silva(at)kayrros(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Geometric types row estimation |
| Date: | 2022-11-30 17:48:18 |
| Message-ID: | CADArKzVDRXPwhdnZdC5TZ1yOW4UyvMej+KcsFCLuSmnT0SbkjQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Ok I'll do that, thanks a lot!
On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 at 18:45, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Igor ALBUQUERQUE SILVA <i(dot)albuquerque-silva(at)kayrros(dot)com> writes:
> > Thanks a lot for the explanation, I thought the built-in types were more
> > standard, so I didn't mention that I was having the same thing using
> > postgis.
>
> Hm --- you'd have to take that up with the PostGIS people. But they
> at least would be likely to have motivation to improve things.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2022-12-01 17:05:01 | Re: Catching up with performance & PostgreSQL 15 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-11-30 17:45:47 | Re: Geometric types row estimation |