Re: 9.6 parameters messing up my 9.2 pg_dump/pg_restore

Thanks for the responses. For me, using the 9.2 binary was the winner.
Shoulda thought of that!

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

>
> Generally speaking, it helps a lot if you don't insist on restoring the
> output in a single transaction. In this case, that would allow the
> restore to ignore the new parameters and move on.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

Well sure, I can see it increases your chances of getting _something_
restored. But there's also a lot to be said for ensuring that _all_ your
data restored, and did so correctly, no?

Cheers,
Ken

--
AGENCY Software
A Free Software data system
By and for non-profits
*http://agency-software.org/ <http://agency-software.org/>*
*https://agency-software.org/demo/client
<https://agency-software.org/demo/client>*
ken(dot)tanzer(at)agency-software(dot)org
(253) 245-3801

Subscribe to the mailing list
<agency-general-request(at)lists(dot)sourceforge(dot)net?body=subscribe> to
learn more about AGENCY or
follow the discussion.