From: | Ken Tanzer <ken(dot)tanzer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rich Shepard <rshepard(at)appl-ecosys(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Subquery to select max(date) value |
Date: | 2019-03-28 23:21:59 |
Message-ID: | CAD3a31US2nNsY5jhasTMDHixK3WQJnnCi_2hyQY5vsgUGsOaTw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 4:14 PM Rich Shepard <rshepard(at)appl-ecosys(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, Ken Tanzer wrote:
>
> > You need the ORDER BY in the outer join.
>
> Ken,
>
> I thought so. But, ...
>
> > (And I don't think the one inside the lateral join is doing you any
> good).
> > Try:
> > ...
> > a.next_contact is not null
> > limit 1) sq
> > order by sq.next_contact DESC;
>
> This re-orders the returned set, but still not in chronological order.
>
Really? Is your next_contact field a date field and not a text field?
What order does it come out in?
(And I assume you saw David J's correction to the misinformation I offered.)
Cheers,
Ken
--
AGENCY Software
A Free Software data system
By and for non-profits
*http://agency-software.org/ <http://agency-software.org/>*
*https://demo.agency-software.org/client
<https://demo.agency-software.org/client>*
ken(dot)tanzer(at)agency-software(dot)org
(253) 245-3801
Subscribe to the mailing list
<agency-general-request(at)lists(dot)sourceforge(dot)net?body=subscribe> to
learn more about AGENCY or
follow the discussion.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2019-03-28 23:31:39 | Re: Subquery to select max(date) value |
Previous Message | Rich Shepard | 2019-03-28 23:21:45 | Re: Subquery to select max(date) value |