From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Abinaya k <abinaya(dot)k(dot)496(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Regarding ambulkdelete, amvacuumcleanup index methods |
Date: | 2018-01-24 07:54:22 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoDr6=5BbJp4coAXSd5WJu9jsK61hKNn1q5Ums8VW1sz+A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Abinaya k <abinaya(dot)k(dot)496(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hai all,
> We are building In-memory index extension for postgres. We would
> capture table inserts, updates, deletes using triggers. During vacuum
> operation, postgres would give calls to ambulkdelete, amvacuumcleanup (as
> part of index cleanup). As we handle all updates, deletes using triggers, we
> don't have to do any index cleanup in ambulkdelete. But, what stats should i
> return from ambulkdelete and amvacuumcleanup? Is that necessary to return
> stats from ambulkdelete and amvacuumcleanup ?
Both ambulkdelete and amvacuumcleanup return an IndexBulkDeleteResult.
If you return a non-NULL value, the values of returned
IndexBulkDeleteResult are used for updating the index statistics and
reporting the statistics of bulk deletion in lazy_cleanup_index. For
example, num_pages and num_index_tuples are used for updating
pg_class.relpages and pg_class.reltuples. But if you return NULL from
them, these are skipped.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2018-01-24 08:00:07 | Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts |
Previous Message | Gaddam Sai Ram | 2018-01-24 07:37:16 | Help needed in using 'on_dsm_detach' callback |