From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Vitaly Davydov <v(dot)davydov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Slot's restart_lsn may point to removed WAL segment after hard restart unexpectedly |
Date: | 2025-04-29 17:25:00 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoDp4Zabk49G94TdWrthfv+0mhHLA6yw-AJxxRSFWPep+g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 6:39 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 4:03 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 8:17 AM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have a question - is there any interest to backport the solution into
> > > > existing major releases?
> > >
> > > As long as this is the bug, it should be backpatched to all supported
> > > affected releases.
> >
> > Yes, but I think we cannot back-patch the proposed fix to back
> > branches as it changes the ReplicationSlot struct defined in slot.h,
> > which breaks ABI compatibility.
>
> Yes, and I think Vitaly already proposed to address this issue. This
> aspect also needs to be carefully reviewed for sure.
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 5:32 PM Vitaly Davydov <v(dot)davydov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> > I can prepare a patch where restart_lsn_flushed stored
> > outside of ReplicationSlot structure and doesn't affect the existing API.
Oh, I totally missed this part. Sorry for making noise. I'll review
the patch once submitted.
Regarding the proposed patch, I think we can somewhat follow
last_saved_confirmed_flush field of ReplicationSlot. For example, we
can set restart_lsn_flushed when restoring the slot from the disk,
etc.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Pyhalov | 2025-04-29 17:25:48 | Re: MergeAppend could consider sorting cheapest child path |
Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-04-29 17:24:06 | Re: allow changing autovacuum_max_workers without restarting |