Re: 2021-07 CF now in progress

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2021-07 CF now in progress
Date: 2021-08-03 02:14:39
Message-ID: CAD21AoD_5zTmtE8Ncvw2K06uaVBcOyYzAtCNNF-uAinTtGXU8g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 10:50 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 10:43 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > > I can close this commitfest. But should we mark uncommitted patches as
> > > "Moved to next CF" or "Returned with Feedback" beforehand?
> >
> > Should be moved to next CF, or at least most of them should be.
> > (But I doubt anyone wants to try to kill off patches that
> > aren't going anywhere right now.)
>
> Agreed. I'll close this commitfest soon. The patches are automatically
> marked as "Moved to next CF" by closing the commitfest?

It seems not.

Anyway, I've closed this commitfest. I'll move uncommitted patch
entries to the next commitfest.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2021-08-03 02:19:22 Re: Background writer and checkpointer in crash recovery
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-08-03 02:12:22 Re: Release 13 of the PostgreSQL BuildFarm client