Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc
Date: 2023-12-21 01:18:22
Message-ID: CAD21AoDQ80Himyhpwu14FUE4UezCq7biOCGAY6DcVBjd4b34sA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:13 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 9:04 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 10:43:30AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > > Thank you for updating the patch. The v2 patch looks good to me. I'll
> > > push it, barring any objections.
> >
> > This is capturing the eight records where the flag exists, so it looks
> > OK seen from here.
> >
> > As you said, there may be a point in reducing the output in the most
> > common case and not show the flag when !isCatalogRel, but I cannot get
> > excited about that either because that would require one to do more
> > cross-checks with the core code when looking at WAL dumps.
>
> Thank you for the comments. Agreed.
>
> I've just pushed, bf6260b39.
>

FYI, in the commitfest app, there seems to be two duplicated entries
for this item:

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/46/4694/
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/46/4695/

I've marked the latter one as committed, and will remove the former.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2023-12-21 01:19:44 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2023-12-21 01:13:16 Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc