Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query
Date: 2018-07-02 06:12:02
Message-ID: CAD21AoCyBbitVXZn=LHdXCuY5NfL1kQMPRYzBbWiTOVZNkE8oQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 7:28 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I'd like to test and review this patches but they seem to conflict
>> with current HEAD. Could you please rebase them?
>
> Hi Sawada-san,
>
> Thanks! Rebased and attached. The only changes are: the LWLock
> tranche is now shown as "serializable_xact" instead of "sxact" (hmm,
> LWLock tranches have lower_case_names_with_underscores, but individual
> LWLocks have CamelCaseName...), and ShareSerializableXact() no longer
> does Assert(!IsParallelWorker()). These changes are based on the last
> feedback from Robert.
>

Thank you! Will look at patches.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2018-07-02 06:59:03 Re: inconsistency and inefficiency in setup_conversion()
Previous Message Amit Langote 2018-07-02 05:57:18 Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported